Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicholas David Ionel vs Alexis Musialek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ionel vs Musialek analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicholas David Ionel vs Alexis Musialek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ionel 1 - 0 Musialek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ionel has won 44.16% of points on his second serve, while Musialek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ionel, in recent form, has won 53.24% of his opponent's second serve points, while Musialek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.7% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ionel has saved 58.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Musialek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ionel has won 54.32% of matches played (W/L 44/ 37), with Musialek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ionel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 54/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Musialek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 251/ 169), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 17/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Ionel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.15% of matches (W/L 37/ 15), where as Musialek has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ionel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ionel winning 2 and Musialek winning 0. The last match between Ionel and Musialek was at the M15 Marrakech, 20-03-2022, Final, Clay with Nicholas David Ionel getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ionel and Musialek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ionel winning 0 times and Musialek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ionel winning 0, and Musialek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ionel has played against opponents with an average rank of 252.2 while Musialek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ionel has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Musialek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ionel has converted 50.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Musialek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
386
Rank
184
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
879
Rank
255
High
35
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
61% (238-151)
Career Total W/L
58% (367-263)
58% (22-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,475
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nicholas David Ionel | Alexis Musialek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (28/47) | 56% (32/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (18/28) | 44% (14/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (11/19) | 36% (9/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (34/57) | 38% (18/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Alexis Musialek
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicholas David Ionel | Alexis Musialek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (22/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (48/41) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (417/376) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (22/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 101 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:41 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 252.47 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (1802/2504) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (1145/1802) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (310/702) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (144/286) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1082/2457) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (18/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (22/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (18/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Nicholas David Ionel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Samuil Konov
76%
(
73 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
80%
(
67 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
22%
(
2 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Mihai Alexandru Coman
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
81%
(
58 of
72)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Francisco Rocha
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
86%
(
66 of
77)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
50 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Daniel Merida Aguilar
79%
(
76 of
96)
1st Serve %
81%
(
58 of
72)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Alexis Musialek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Alexis Musialek
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Cayre
Player
Alexis Musialek
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Winter Lopez
Player
Alexis Musialek
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xavi Matas Ortega
Player
Alexis Musialek
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Alexis Musialek
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Akira Santillan
Player
Alexis Musialek
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Musialek
Player
Ryan Nijboer
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Potenza
Player
Alexis Musialek
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
48%
(
14 of
29)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
14 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
42
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Alexis Musialek
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Alexis Musialek
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ionel Vs Musialek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
